Skip to main content

The system behind how Yopla measures, decides and delivers.

One evidence trail, one decision record and one delivery system. Every engagement we run lives here, and so does yours.

One organisation, three readings

Live

What the team believes · their own ratings

84

What the instruments measured · tested, not asked

64

What we verified · auditor reviewed

71

Belief vs reality

That gap is where the work is.

0 pts

01·What it measures

Tested, observed, verified. Not asked.

The workspace joins skills, profiles, team perception, organisational networks, process evidence, technology, investment and delivery. These are the readings it produces.

Operations lead

Finance manager

Head of sales

Coordinator

Self-ratedTested

02·People

People, tested.

Digital fluency is tested, not asked. Every person’s real capability with the tools, measured against what they believe about themselves.

Tested skills beside self-belief, so the gap is visible per person

Operating styles, personality profiles and identity tension from real instruments

Team perception, recognition and friction grounded in surveys and conversations

Structure · drawn vs measured

The structure you drew

Sam

Who people actually go to

If Sam leaves, 9 people lose their go-to. Sam has never been in a planning meeting.

Reporting lines, as drawnMeasured go-to dependency

Span of dependency · network instrument · anonymised example

03·Knowledge

Knowledge, mapped.

Who really holds what, and who the work quietly routes through. The shadow hierarchy and the knowledge tree, made visible before they become resignation risk.

Where critical knowledge lives in one head, undocumented

Formal structure beside the shadow hierarchy and real go-to network

Coverage, security contacts and spans of dependency made visible

Annual spend · today vs proposed

CRM

Finance

Comms

Data

TodayProposed

04·Technology

Technology, surfaced.

Every tool actually in use, including the ones nobody told IT about, with what each one costs and what it returns.

Full stack inventory with real spend per platform

Shadow tooling your teams quietly adopted, surfaced

Spend benchmarked against organisations like yours

Process ledger · documentation

8 of 24 processes live only in someone's head.

Documented 10Partial 6Undocumented 8

05·Process

Process, logged.

A ledger of how work actually flows. Where time really goes, who owns each process, and what breaks when one person is away.

Named owners, frequency and effort for every real process

Documentation coverage: written down, or living in a head

Dependencies mapped, so change is sequenced honestly

06·The audit scope

The organisation is wider than its technology stack.

The scope follows the decision. We combine only the readings needed to understand what is happening and what should change.

People and culture

Digital fluency, psychological profiles, operating styles, team perception, recognition, friction and anonymous culture signals.

Structure and knowledge

Formal org charts, shadow hierarchies, knowledge trees, security networks, coverage maps and spans of dependency.

Work and systems

Function and time, process documentation, technology adoption, shadow tooling, investment and operational resilience.

Evidence and verdict

Maturity, perception gaps, claimed versus measured capability, answer integrity, conversation themes and cross-instrument findings.

07·What it is worth

"31 hours a week were going to work the tools should have been doing."

£212,000 / yr

measured, recoverable

Illustrative example from a 40-person organisation · Function and Time instrument

See your organisation properly understood, for the first time.

The first picture is the moment you stop guessing about your own business. When you are ready to see it, we should talk.